And then there's this simple question from the doctor:
"You've been in pain from this for 5-and-a-half years, and this is the first time a doctor is seeing it? "
Well, yes. Funny how that happened. I fell and landed on my back and then saw doctors for that and then had physical therapy. At physical therapy, they improved my back, and my hip started hurting. The PT folks said to come back if the hip didn't improve on its own. When it still hurt a few years later and I had a better job, I went to PT for it without seeing a doctor. It makes sense. But five and a half years? Is my sense of pain and my way of dealing with it so screwed up that I would let this thing happen to me when I would not let it happen to another?
The regrets start again.
What if
I had gone
right when it
started hurting
or at least earlier
than 5 years?
Could I have prevented something? Lessened
some damage? Did my lack
cause this more serious hurt?
Could this regret have been prevented?
Common sense intrudes.
And when
would you have found
time for this? And money?
And energy? You did not
have these things. Let go. Learn. Move on.
Stop hurting yourself more
over the hurt you may
or may not
have done yourself.
Be at peace.
Live now.
Go.
I try to convince myself not to expect the worst.
Maybe it's not torn cartilage or arthritis. Maybe it is something to do with the natural structure and inflammation, and it can be fixed. Maybe the flying pigs can fix it after they stop this sick feeling in my stomach which may be more related to allergies than stressing out about imaginary potential hip surgery it will be hard for me to afford. Or not so imaginary tests involving needles in my hip and how debilitated I was from needles in my wrist.
Be at peace, dagnabbit. Why won't you listen?
Worrying won't help. God is with you.
You'll be fine no matter what happens.
Clutch towel. Don't panic.
Breathe in. Breathe out.
Showing posts with label contrariness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label contrariness. Show all posts
Saturday, September 15, 2012
Monday, November 1, 2010
Stories to tell: the exercise room
I wonder about the dark-skinned, middle-aged, middle-Asian man who seems to be stalking me in the exercise room at my apartment. I don't exercise at the same time every day (I'm in there anywhere from 6:30 AM to 8 PM, depending on my crazy schedule, and it seems like soon after I enter, he shows up. I never watch the TV because I am reading and using the stair climber. He heads straight to the TV, where he religiously tunes in to one of two channels: The Women's Network or Black Music America.
I am careful not to make eye contact with people I don't know in particular and men in general, so I don't know if he is as embarrassed as I am to exercise to commercials and infomercials for maxi pads, Vagisil, women's health issues, and miracle bras in the company of a member of the opposite gender who should really have very little interest in these things. Does he enjoy the talk shows and soap operas? I can only assume he is totally comfortable with this stuff that is hideously embarrassing to me (even if it were with a male friend), or why would he do this all the time? We have never talked. I don't know if he speaks English, so it's only inside my head that I ask him, "Have you no shame?!" when some particularly excruciatingly embarrassing topic is displayed.
Variety is the spice of life, so sometimes at random and always on Sunday mornings, he zooms in to Black Music America, a channel that shows random pictures and plays music from artists you would expect from the name of the channel (with more of an emphasis on gospel music on Sundays).
Why these two channels? Why me? God only knows . . .
I am careful not to make eye contact with people I don't know in particular and men in general, so I don't know if he is as embarrassed as I am to exercise to commercials and infomercials for maxi pads, Vagisil, women's health issues, and miracle bras in the company of a member of the opposite gender who should really have very little interest in these things. Does he enjoy the talk shows and soap operas? I can only assume he is totally comfortable with this stuff that is hideously embarrassing to me (even if it were with a male friend), or why would he do this all the time? We have never talked. I don't know if he speaks English, so it's only inside my head that I ask him, "Have you no shame?!" when some particularly excruciatingly embarrassing topic is displayed.
Variety is the spice of life, so sometimes at random and always on Sunday mornings, he zooms in to Black Music America, a channel that shows random pictures and plays music from artists you would expect from the name of the channel (with more of an emphasis on gospel music on Sundays).
Why these two channels? Why me? God only knows . . .
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Grumbling, Disagreeable, possibly-Entertaining critics
I was book reading reviews today, and I cracked up after the fourth Booklist review contradicted all the others (Library Journal, Publisher's Weekly, even Kirkus Review). All four of these Booklist reviews said, "Sniff. Well, I suppose the young, unsophisticated people like that sort of low-brown, pedestrian thing, but we found it frankly tiresome and boring and didn't like it at ALL. Sniff."
Usually they were more specific and pointed out that they specifically hated the things the other reviews liked. If Publisher's Weekly loved the outstanding character development, Booklist thought the book suffered because it was populated with undeveloped, stock character types. If Library Journal loved the sophisticated, twisty plot, Booklist thought the whole thing was terribly predictable and didn't have a moment of REAL suspense. Sigh.
It's not like I don't understand being contrary as a way to seem smart, and it's not like I don't understand how everyone liking something can make one not like it JUST BECAUSE, but if I were a reviewer, and I knew I was having that kind of petulant, immature, biased reaction, I would hope I had the professionalism to deal with it maturely or else pass the review on to someone who could. For Pete's sake.
At least I got a laugh out of it.
Have you ever felt that way about a book everyone seemed to praise to the skies? (What book?) Did you read it? Did reading it change your mind?
Usually they were more specific and pointed out that they specifically hated the things the other reviews liked. If Publisher's Weekly loved the outstanding character development, Booklist thought the book suffered because it was populated with undeveloped, stock character types. If Library Journal loved the sophisticated, twisty plot, Booklist thought the whole thing was terribly predictable and didn't have a moment of REAL suspense. Sigh.
It's not like I don't understand being contrary as a way to seem smart, and it's not like I don't understand how everyone liking something can make one not like it JUST BECAUSE, but if I were a reviewer, and I knew I was having that kind of petulant, immature, biased reaction, I would hope I had the professionalism to deal with it maturely or else pass the review on to someone who could. For Pete's sake.
At least I got a laugh out of it.
Have you ever felt that way about a book everyone seemed to praise to the skies? (What book?) Did you read it? Did reading it change your mind?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)